Posted by: audioofamber | December 8, 2008

Rage for a Monday morning.

An appeal judge in Australia has ruled that an animation depicting well-known cartoon characters engaging in sexual acts is child pornography.

The internet cartoon featured characters from the Simpsons TV series.

The central issue in the case was whether a cartoon character could depict a real person.

Judge Michael Adams decided that it could, and found a man from Sydney guilty of possessing child pornography on his computer.

The defence had argued that the fictional, animated characters were not real people, and clearly departed from the human form.

They therefore contested that the conviction for the possession of child pornography should be overturned.

Justice Michael Adams said the purpose of anti-child pornography legislation was to stop sexual exploitation and child abuse where images of “real” children were depicted.

But in a landmark ruling he decided that the mere fact that they were not realistic representations of human beings did not mean that they could not be considered people.

He ruled that the animated cartoon could “fuel demand for material that does involve the abuse of children,” and therefore upheld the conviction for child pornography.

Rather than jail the man, however, he fined him Aus$3,000 (US$2,000).

At least it was only a $2000 fine but COME ON. Guh.

Source: BBC News.

See last week’s post in my blog about what Neil Gaiman has to say on freedom of speech.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. “could” fuel demand?
    COULD?
    As in *maybe*?

    Like “I’m convicting you despite the fact that what you are charged with doesn’t exist but since it might inspire the possession by others of what you were charged with”

    I’m going out of my fucking mind over here!!!!

  2. I know. Freaking INSANE.

    Good to see at least I am passionate about one subject in this world… that subject is Simpsons porn. LOL

  3. I’m afraid to confess that we lead the Western world in letting our governments and legislators roll over us in some misguided protective “won’t-somebody-think-of-the-children?” hysteria that appeals to the morally conservative, easily-led majority of voters.

    I guess this is what happens when your country does not have a bill of rights. :(

    Rest assured that not all Australians are as blinkered in their view.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: